8.6 C
London
Wednesday, November 25, 2020

The Constitutional Tribunal will consider the question of the admissibility of abortion

Must read

Ben Affleck had a ‘dissociative panic assault’ after smoking weed on ‘Dazed and Confused’ set

Ben Affleck is reflecting on certainly one of his earlier experiences with hashish.The “Argo” actor, 48, made the revelation in a brand new...

Love Is Blind’s Mark Cuevas Is Engaged to Girlfriend Aubrey

Whereas they have been one of many six {couples} to get engaged within the pods (nicely, a minimum of the six that the...

Swansea 1 – 1 Sheff Wed

Andre Ayew struck...

Millionaires: The time it takes for mild to journey from the Solar to the Earth is… Reply to the query

The time it takes for mild to journey from the Solar to Earth is roughly eight seconds, eight minutes, 24 hours or 365...
- Advertisement -


The Constitutional Tribunal will today deal with the issue of the admissibility of abortion in the event of severe fetal impairment. If the Constitutional Tribunal decides that the challenged provisions are unconstitutional, this will be the first change to the abortion compromise developed in 1993.

The request of a group of deputies on this issue was submitted to the Constitutional Court for the first time three years ago. However, due to the end of the parliamentary term, it was discontinued. Once again, the application was submitted to the Constitutional Tribunal in 2019 – it was submitted by a group of 119 MPs from PiS, PSL-Kukiz’15 and the Confederation. The applicants are represented by MPs from Law and Justice Bartłomiej Wróblewski and Piotr Uściński.

The Constitutional Tribunal is to hear the case as a full bench. The chairman of the adjudication panel will be Julia Przyłębska, and the rapporteur – judge Justyn Piskorski. The application challenged the provision that an abortion is permissible when prenatal tests or other medical grounds indicate a high probability of severe and irreversible impairment of the fetus or an incurable life-threatening disease, and a provision clarifying this regulation. In the opinion of the applicants, these provisions legalize eugenic practices in relation to a child who is not yet born, thus refusing to respect the protection of human dignity.

“The legal justification of the eugenic premise in a democratic state ruled by law raises fundamental doubts” – reads the application. It emphasizes that a broad understanding of the concept of “human”, also including the human being in the prenatal stage of development, “finds a strong justification in the protection of human dignity.”

WATCH TVN24 ON THE INTERNET >>>

The Constitutional Tribunal will consider the question of the admissibility of abortionMarcin Obara / PAP

“The concept of ‘human’ also includes the phase of a human being’s life before birth”

“Since the attribute of human dignity belongs to man from the moment of the inception of human life, and the protection of the right to life is a direct consequence of the protection of human dignity, the interpretation of Article 38 of the Constitution in the light of Article 30 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland leads to the conclusion that the right to life is a human right in stage of development, at which he is also entitled to the protection of human dignity, and therefore also in the prenatal period “- we read.

On Wednesday afternoon, positions on this matter were posted by the Prosecutor General and the Sejm on the website of the Constitutional Tribunal. Both organs request that the challenged provisions be recognized as inconsistent with the constitution.

“According to the prevailing views of the doctrine (…) there is an obligation to protect human life in the prenatal phase and the prohibition of discriminating against conceived human beings by public authorities, and the concept of ‘man’ used in the provision of Article 38 of the Constitution also covers the phase of a human being’s life before birth “- we read in the position of the Public Prosecutor General. As then pointed out, “since life begins at conception, from the first day of pregnancy, constitutional protection applies to human life in every phase of it.”

In the position of the Sejm, it was stated that the analysis of the constitutionality of the challenged provisions leads to confirmation of the applicants’ allegations “as to the failure to fulfill the obligation of the Republic of Poland to provide legal protection of life”. In the opinion of the Sejm, interference in this area is disproportionate and constitutes unequal and discriminatory treatment leading to a violation of dignity. Moreover, the provisions setting out the grounds for termination of pregnancy, according to the Sejm, “lack sufficient specificity”.

“This is a step towards women’s incapacitation”

The debate on the position of the Sejm took place last Friday at the session of the parliamentary legislative committee – then in voting on the draft position prepared by the Sejm Analysis Bureau, the deputies split 14 to 14, which means that the position did not receive support. However, this vote was not binding.

At the committee meeting, there were also critical voices from MPs and members of the opposition, who emphasized that it is unacceptable to force women to bear a child that has no chance of survival. These arguments have appeared before, incl. as part of the action #WyroknaKobiety initiated by the members of the Left. As the originators explained, the Tribunal’s recognition of the unconstitutionality of the challenged provisions “will be a judgment issued against all women in Poland, on their rights.

– The application to the Constitutional Tribunal is a step towards incapacitating women and, above all, reducing women to the role of silent incubators who have no right to decide about their health, body and life – said Katarzyna Kotula, MP from Lewica in October. According to another member of this group, Agnieszka Dziemianowicz-Bąk, the United Right has found “a cunning way to ban abortion completely while avoiding social protests.”

Organizing larger gatherings is currently impossible due to the coronavirus pandemic. This week, the National Women’s Strike conducted several days of protest using other forms of expressing objections. As part of it, a car strike was carried out. On Thursday, it is to be held on the route between the Constitutional Tribunal and the Supreme Court.

Demonstration in front of the Constitutional TribunalMarcin Obara / PAP

Doctors appeal to the Constitutional Tribunal

So far, over 800 doctors have signed an open letter to the Constitutional Tribunal, in which they argue that deleting the premise on termination of pregnancy due to fetal defects will pose a significant threat to women’s physical and mental health.

“The medical vocation is to alleviate suffering, and the highest moral imperative is the good of the patient and public health. The waiver of the admissibility of termination of pregnancy will put doctors in a situation where they will have to inflict or prolong this suffering against the patient’s will and with the awareness of possible complications” – we read.

The Act on family planning, protection of the human fetus and conditions for termination of pregnancy, in force since 1993, allows for abortion in three cases – when pregnancy poses a threat to the life or health of a woman, there is a high probability of a severe and irreversible impairment of the fetus or an incurable disease that threatens its life, or when the pregnancy arose as a result of a prohibited act.

In the first two cases, termination of pregnancy is acceptable until the fetus is able to live independently outside the mother’s body; in the case of a prohibited act – if no more than 12 weeks have elapsed from the beginning of pregnancy.

According to the data of the Ministry of Health, 1110 procedures of legal termination of pregnancy were performed in Poland in 2019. As many as 1074 of them were made precisely because of an irreversible handicap or incurable disease of the fetus. It is not known what the total number of procedures performed is – some of them are performed outside the country, and some illegally. Some statistics say about several thousand, others about over 100 thousand treatments per year.

Main photo source: Marcin Obara / PAP



More

- Advertisement -

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Ben Affleck had a ‘dissociative panic assault’ after smoking weed on ‘Dazed and Confused’ set

Ben Affleck is reflecting on certainly one of his earlier experiences with hashish.The “Argo” actor, 48, made the revelation in a brand new...

Love Is Blind’s Mark Cuevas Is Engaged to Girlfriend Aubrey

Whereas they have been one of many six {couples} to get engaged within the pods (nicely, a minimum of the six that the...

Swansea 1 – 1 Sheff Wed

Andre Ayew struck...

Millionaires: The time it takes for mild to journey from the Solar to the Earth is… Reply to the query

The time it takes for mild to journey from the Solar to Earth is roughly eight seconds, eight minutes, 24 hours or 365...

Jennifer Lopez Poses Utterly Nude in Jaw-Dropping Photograph

Jennifer Lopez have to be making an attempt to set the web on fireplace, as a result of the brand new promotional picture for...