– This is the (most) fair among the unfair methods of calculating waste fees – said Paweł Głuszyński from the Society for the Earth, who, together with Krystian Krupa from the Jagiellonian Institute, was a guest of Thursday’s “Yes,” on TVN24.
Since April 1, many cities have changed the rules of charging for garbage collection. In Warsaw, they were combined with water consumption (a cubic meter multiplied by 12 zlotys and 73 groszes). For many residents, this meant large increases. Is this the best bid calculation method? The guests wondered “Yes, sir.”
“A very large group of people do not pay for waste”
– Unfortunately, in the situation of Poland we are dealing with such a phenomenon that a very large group of people do not pay for waste. I do not know to what extent these data are true, but according to the reports of Marshal’s Offices, nearly 10 million people do not pay for waste in Poland, i.e. a third of the population. Warsaw has the same problem. Here the scale is also not exactly unequivocally determinable. Perhaps even half a million people do not pay such a fee – said Paweł Głuszyński from the Society for the Earth.
He added that the problem in Warsaw is that many people live here, but do not check in and do not submit a declaration on the basis of which the fee for waste was calculated. Therefore, the city had to take advantage of other opportunities provided by the law.
– Certainly, this is one of the allowed methods of calculating the fee for waste in accordance with the Act on maintaining cleanliness and order in municipalities. The sixth article allows for the calculation of the number of people living in one place according to the water consumption, according to the area of the premises or according to the number of people – noted Krystian Krupa from the Jagiellonian Institute. He also said that it is common to undercut the square footage or the declared number of people living in a given place in order to pay less.
– From this point of view, linking the fee for waste with water consumption is the most objective way. Similar to electricity consumption, it generally allows these charges to be measured in a manner that is less likely to be manipulated. It is worth noting that measuring the amount of waste produced by a household is much more difficult than measuring water or electricity, argued Krupa.
Waste rate? “This option is not considered”
Głuszyński, when asked if the fees could not be calculated in a simpler way, e.g. on the amount of waste, replied: – This option is not considered by the Ministry of Climate, which is responsible for the amendment of these regulations. This is the so-called “pay for what you produce” system. Possibly, an option will be introduced for individual settlement of residents in multi-family and multi-apartment buildings, i.e. in blocks of flats. The ministry, on the other hand, opposes, and the local government similarly, to introduce this fee precisely conditioned by the amount of waste that we donate to the system.
As he added, local governments claim that such a solution would increase the administrative costs of the system. – This is not true and such systems function in dozens, hundreds, thousands of cities in Western Europe and also on other continents. And this is the fairest method and allows the segregation system to improve significantly – said Paweł Głuszyński.
Main photo source: TVN24